Quote:
Actually, according to the letter by press sec. MND: 'Advisers and MPs have different roles' [ST, 27Oct2009] in response to ''Adviser over MP' raises many questions' [ST, 22Oct2009], and - 'Grassroots Organizations should stay non-partisan' [TR, 03Nov2009] I think that the PA ought to be gazetted a 'political association' too.
Excerpts appended as follows:
Notwithstanding the fact that the concept of 'grassroots advisers' is quite ridiculous beside being un-statutory under s24 of, Town Council Act (Cap.329A) to begin with, (see: 'Is Mr MBT (and HDB) quite mistaken regarding the statutory requirements for the Lift Upgrading Prog?' [A1forum13Jan2011])
The statement "Opposition MPs cannot be appointed advisers, because they do not answer to the ruling party. " implies that the 'grassroots advisers' from the Peoples Association (PA) [directory@gov.sg], are appointed by HDB for the purpose of managing the LUP precisely because they, in the words of MBT's MND press sec: "answer to the ruling party"
So with MBT's MND so explicitly endorsing of the partisan leanings of PA prescribed 'grassroots advisers' and the blatant partisan leanings as alluded to in "PAP MPs are appointed as advisers to the grassroots organisations in their wards by the People’s Association (PA). In the two opposition wards, the PA picked the PAP candidates who contested but lost in the wards in the last two polls as the grassroots advisers."[ST,22Oct2009]
How then is it possible for the PA to possibly not be gazetted a 'political association' given the requirement of it's 'grassroots adviser's' affiliation to "answer to the ruling party"?
- "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."-- Benjamin Franklin.
References:
- '‘Adviser over MP’ raises many questions': "PAP MPs are appointed as advisers to the grassroots organisations in their wards by the People’s Association (PA). In the two opposition wards, the PA picked the PAP candidates who contested but lost in the wards in the last two polls as the grassroots advisers." [ST22Oct2009(@TR website)][alt link]
- 'Grassroots Organizations should stay non-partisan': "By appointing PAP candidates as grassroots advisers in Opposition held wards, the government is effectively bringing partisan politics into governmental institutions. Using the PA as a vehicle for PAP candidates as grounds to gain political capital so that they may fight their next battle with more goodwill, the governmental risks costing itself the position of Singapore as a Parliamentary Democracy; and put Singapore in par with communist states like Cuba, China and North Korea." [TR, 03Nov2009]
- 'Gov’t to gazette political blog ‘The Online Citizen': "On Nov 12 last year, human rights advocacy group Maruah joined three other organizations — the Open Singapore Centre, the Think Centre and Singaporeans For Democracy — to be gazetted as a political association." [FTP,12Jan2011]
Majulah Singapura.
Rgds,
B.C.
Excerpts appended as follows:
Quote:
| Advisers and MPs have different roles [ST,27Oct2009]: "In Singapore, MPs also have an important role in running town councils. As provided for in the Town Councils Act, this role includes managing the common property of HDB estates and carrying out local improvement projects, thereby contributing to the well-being of the people of the constituency... The roles of MP and adviser are distinct and separate, even though government MPs, wearing their other hat of advisers, are expected to perform both roles. Opposition MPs cannot be appointed advisers, because they do not answer to the ruling party. .. Therefore, in opposition wards, it is the government-appointed adviser who is accountable for implementing national programmes like the LUP. In doing so, the adviser will work closely with the local town council and residents. |
Quote:
| '‘Adviser over MP’ raises many questions'[ST, 22Oct2009]: "PAP MPs are appointed as advisers to the grassroots organisations in their wards by the People’s Association (PA). In the two opposition wards, the PA picked the PAP candidates who contested but lost in the wards in the last two polls as the grassroots advisers." |
Quote:
| 'Grassroots Organizations should stay non-partisan'[03Nov2009]: "By appointing PAP candidates as grassroots advisers in Opposition held wards, the government is effectively bringing partisan politics into governmental institutions. Using the PA as a vehicle for PAP candidates as grounds to gain political capital so that they may fight their next battle with more goodwill, the governmental risks costing itself the position of Singapore as a Parliamentary Democracy; and put Singapore in par with communist states like Cuba, China and North Korea." |
The statement "Opposition MPs cannot be appointed advisers, because they do not answer to the ruling party. " implies that the 'grassroots advisers' from the Peoples Association (PA) [directory@gov.sg], are appointed by HDB for the purpose of managing the LUP precisely because they, in the words of MBT's MND press sec: "answer to the ruling party"
So with MBT's MND so explicitly endorsing of the partisan leanings of PA prescribed 'grassroots advisers' and the blatant partisan leanings as alluded to in "PAP MPs are appointed as advisers to the grassroots organisations in their wards by the People’s Association (PA). In the two opposition wards, the PA picked the PAP candidates who contested but lost in the wards in the last two polls as the grassroots advisers."[ST,22Oct2009]
How then is it possible for the PA to possibly not be gazetted a 'political association' given the requirement of it's 'grassroots adviser's' affiliation to "answer to the ruling party"?
- "Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."-- Benjamin Franklin.
References:
- '‘Adviser over MP’ raises many questions': "PAP MPs are appointed as advisers to the grassroots organisations in their wards by the People’s Association (PA). In the two opposition wards, the PA picked the PAP candidates who contested but lost in the wards in the last two polls as the grassroots advisers." [ST22Oct2009(@TR website)][alt link]
- 'Grassroots Organizations should stay non-partisan': "By appointing PAP candidates as grassroots advisers in Opposition held wards, the government is effectively bringing partisan politics into governmental institutions. Using the PA as a vehicle for PAP candidates as grounds to gain political capital so that they may fight their next battle with more goodwill, the governmental risks costing itself the position of Singapore as a Parliamentary Democracy; and put Singapore in par with communist states like Cuba, China and North Korea." [TR, 03Nov2009]
- 'Gov’t to gazette political blog ‘The Online Citizen': "On Nov 12 last year, human rights advocacy group Maruah joined three other organizations — the Open Singapore Centre, the Think Centre and Singaporeans For Democracy — to be gazetted as a political association." [FTP,12Jan2011]
Quote:
| 'POLITICAL DONATIONS ACT (CHAPTER 236)' Interpretation 2. —(1) In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires — "political association" means — (a) a political party or an organisation which has as one of its objects or activities the promotion or procuring of the election to Parliament or to the office of President of a candidate or candidates endorsed by the organisation; or (b) an organisation (not being a branch of any organisation) whose objects or activities relate wholly or mainly to politics in Singapore and which is declared by the Minister, by order in the Gazette, to be a political association for the purposes of this Act; |
Majulah Singapura.
Rgds,
B.C.
------------------------------
At/ related:
A1forum:
13Jan2011: Re: The Beginning: TOC to be gazetted as a Political Association
No comments:
Post a Comment