[Labour Justice] All foreigners should bid for standard work permit, COE style.

[Labour Justice] All foreigners should bid for standard work permit, COE style.

Only category available= 1 year work pass option, paid lump sum in advance before COE is issued.

For unused portion, will be refunded like 75% unused, refund 60%. 50% unused refund 40%, 25% unused refund 20%.

Daily work pass for visiting workers celebrity chef, licensed professionals requiring shorter employment periods or prior to successful bidding of annual COE employment pass will pay a daily rate double that of the PQP (last 3 months annual COE bidding result)

Glass Ceiling Salary level for Singaporean PMET workers may be as low as $1720/month ($2,208.33/monthly if company is honest).

Glass Ceiling Salary level for Singaporean PMET workers may be as low as $1720/month ($2,208.33/monthly if company is honest).

From this point onwards, there is zero financial incentive to hire Singaporean from a corporate balance sheet perspective. This glass ceiling threshold point, whereby any citizenship benifit of being Singaporean vanishes for the Singaporean employee.

The latest economic opportunities available to young and old Singaporeans today.


Older Singaporeans (who are well informed) can earn 20¢ NTUC vouchers, for every 4 cans or bottles salvaged, so there is a long queue at Tampines Hub NTUC due to the volume of recyclables that the elderly have brought in at 10 locations across Singapore (50 by March

Deng XiaoPing original blueprint for HKG- China reunification, happily ever after.

Deng XiaoPing original vision for HKG- China reunification was for the two to unite as one country and establish the best of the 2 systems. Subsequent Chinese leaders betrayed his vision by suppression of democracy in HKG which caused the wealth inequality situation in HKG to go out of control.

If Lee Kuan Yew were the Chief Executive (CE) can he unite Hong Kong?

I.e. do his socialist magic like he did in 1957 onwards to confiscate land from Farmers and rich land owners for a song to build HDB (also sold to citizens for a song) http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/history/eve...24e4cab8c6and give Hong Kongers hope by providing genuine social mobility, where every working adult can have access to affordable housing be it leasehold 99 years or just 1 year public rentals etc?

MOM tiered foreign worker levy scheme treats humans like Brainless robots. Thus the poor productivity of Singaporean workforce.

MOM tiered foreign worker levy scheme treats humans like Brainless robots. Thus the poor productivity of Singaporean workforce.
-----------

pattanispirit(HWZ) said:to solve maid problem :
1. increase birth 
- to increase supply of junior labour like part time babysitters in western countries
- to increase labour market, so mothers can stay home as housewives /caregivers for aged

2. increase childcare centres & old folk homes
how to solve labour shortage in other sectors if more housewives stay at home ?
- import more foreigners ? 
- reduce economy activities ? 

back to square one 22:

============
I think what u have just submitted is quite self contradictory. Please edit it so it can make sense.

Suffice to say, there are trade offs in any rebalancing, the true requirement being that the final outcome is better than the original to society overall.

MOM is the cause of structural unemployment in Singapore. (& the real reason why Minimum Wage is not legislated till now in Singapore.)

MOM is the cause of structural unemployment in Singapore. (& the real reason why Minimum Wage is not legislated till now in Singapore.)

Is simply because almost 38% of Singapore workforce is foreign and even work permit holders make up 27.4% of Singapore workforce, the majority of which may not even be Singaporean if PRs were instead counted as foreigners to begin with.

http://twc2.org.sg/2018/05/22/foreign-workforce-numbers-2017/

Blunt home value based means testing divides families and dampens birth rate of Singaporeans.

Oddly, when challenged, Ms Sim Ann (SMS Finance) said "... targeted schemes form “only a small part” of the total benefits that Singaporeans, including private-property dwellers, receive"...

Is she bending the truth when we all know that GST credits, utilities rebates, education bursaries, medical subsidies (ward charges, CHAS card/ medishield-life premium subsidy), workfare, workfare transport concession, silver support scheme and almost ALL community support schemes (nursing home, home nursing foundation etc) are means tested with 'Annual value (AV) of home' being a core criteria in means testing?

In today's computer age whereby (CNA, 25Feb2016) 'Satellite-based ERP to be ready by 2020, with S$556m contract awarded', surely, a more appropriate per-capita AV calculation cannot be too much to be expected from a "first class political leadership"?

(per capita AV of home is the AV of residence divided by the number of Singaporeans/ PRs residing at the address (owner, family + tenant etc)).

Medishield-life premiums: PRs should pay AT LEAST 30% more. Why shouldn't they???!!!

Since gahmen defines medishield life as so integral and like God send (costs gahmen a lot in budget), then since PRs are at best only half citizens (or less since they can be PRs of elsewhere as well): then why shouldn't they pay an extra of 30% in annual medishield-life premiums???!!! In fact, at polyclinics, PRs have to pay almost TWICE the consultation fees as Singaporeans. Those previously NOT on medishield but now joining medishield life will also have to pay a 30% surcharge so why shouldn't PRs previously on medishield insurance scheme ALSO be charged just an extra 30%???!!!