SLA lassitude costs SG gahmen $1,362,664 in 8 mths rental revenues lost, eateries disrupted and public safety risk nightmare.

The lazy folks @SLA should have their bonuses CUT.
Full report 'Tenants upset over Evans Rd shambles' as appended below.

As I understand, it is standard practise for all landlords to collect 1 month rent asdeposit for each year in rental contract signed: e.g. for a 3 yr rental contract, 3 mths deposit is payable, 10mths for 10yrs and so forth.

'the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) terminated its tenancy agreement with master tenant Winsta Holding on July 31': the day of termination should have been THE SAME DAY that the plot was put up for re-tender, but no, the retender was delayed till Nov30th, a cool 4 months of nothing done, rent collections wasted. Now SLA is saying that the new tenancy will start on Aprils fools day (1st April) 2016, very funny SLA, that is another 4mths proper rent forgone between 1st Dec 2015 and 1st April 2016. I believe that if the SLA (and other gahmen depts) had its finger on the pulse of what was happening @ Evans Rd, " several employees were involved in 'undisclosed interested party transactions'", it would have been more prepared with the re-tender process rather than delaying the process by an additional 4 months.

[Parody]: MediShield Life: Must take medicine but won't? Jail, fine on the cards

The following is a parody of 'MediShield Life: Can pay but won't? Jail, fine on the cards',grey=delete, red = added new text.
Feedback welcomed, pls enjoy.

PS: The old Singapore nanny state is now becoming a police state, Singaporeans, please be prepared.

================================================== =============

MediShield Life: Can pay Must take medicine but won't? Jail, fine on the cards
Wednesday, Jan 21, 2015
My Paper
By Salma Khalik

Lee's Pirate Army (PAP has blurred line between State and party).

A political parody of the PA web page found at http://www.pa.gov.sg/about-us.html and based on article(s): 'How PAP uses taxpayer-funded grassroots for political gain' (G.Giam, 10Oct2009) and ''Adviser over MP' raises many questions' (ST, 22Oct2009).

Romanian ambassador says full legal action will be taken against Ionescu if needed

Me thinks tt SG and Romania are just clowns, doing themselves in and derailing the entire negotiatory process,

"He was asked three times by Singapore if he or the Romanian government would consider attending the birthday party of a hostess in a karaoke lounge as being part of official diplomatic functions.

The ambassador failed to answer the question."
What do U think?