Your definition of "social harmony" remains similarly over-defensive in so far as your title reads "Topics on religion raise the red flag".
The question here is whether A1 forums remains an organized and managed forum, effectual in maintaining cordial inter-racial/ cultural/ religious dialogue, religious understanding, the bedrock upon which our hallowed "social harmony" resides.
Forums are an effectual means of open and transparent communication, sharing of knowledge, with involved moderators to maintain the peace and effectual progress of discussion. This is a favorable situation as compared to one sided niche websites that facilitate little in way of discussion nor mutual edification in their quest to hold an audience captive with the inherent propensity toward one sided agendas and nefarious outcomes- which in the internet age of today, are almost impossible to effectively contain, likewise the long term socio-economic impact of 'new' and powerful religious 'charity' organizations, the recent S$310M acquisition being case in point.
To restrict the open sharing of opinions about the transparency of such large and 'sky-line' changing acquisitions would merely suppress the normal course of progress whereby deficiencies in policy/ practice are adequately dealt with.
...However, the law is effectual regardless. Whosoever "wantonly breach the basic ground rules", then he is at risks of infringement. ...
This message/ article was posted/ reflected in the following forums for discussion:
10June2010: Topics on religion raise the red flag