Policemen on police PMD/ bicycle:
https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/volunteer-bike-patrols-help-keep-expanding-clementi-safeNot for love of money, but of Humanity. "Greater is he who works for the good of all, then he who works for the good of himself only" ~ Matthew 25:40: "The King will reply, 'I tell you the truth, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers of mine, you did for me.'"- (NIV). I live in Singapore where the Emperor must not be disturbed.
https://www.asiaone.com/singapore/volunteer-bike-patrols-help-keep-expanding-clementi-safepattanispirit(HWZ) said:to solve maid problem :============
1. increase birth
- to increase supply of junior labour like part time babysitters in western countries
- to increase labour market, so mothers can stay home as housewives /caregivers for aged
2. increase childcare centres & old folk homes
how to solve labour shortage in other sectors if more housewives stay at home ?
- import more foreigners ?
- reduce economy activities ?
back to square one22:
pattanispirit (HWZ) said:if min wage is implemented, does that apply to maids as well ?
based on current working hr of maid, it's 6 days x 12 hrs min.
that's 72 hrs work week, which means 72-44 hr =28 hr OT, which at least 12 hrs double pay and the rest 1.5x.
if assuming yr min wage is $7 a hour, their basic should be $1,334 + 16x1.5x7 + 12x2x7 = 1334 + 168 + 168 = $1,670
can govt still implement maid levies ?
will housewives still can work part time or full time ?
will children give up their career to take care of their sick or old parent ?
if work outside earning 3k, after cpf and other expenses, what take home is just nice to pay maid.
so, uni grad, dip holder, pmet rather work at home to take care of babies & old ppl than to work for paying maids.
Chromesthlesia(HWZ) said:actually this TS has some excellent points (at times).
But the way you speak ah, I cannot make it past the first paragraph since it's rather emotively-biased.
Example this sentence:
"The amount of $$$ yielded from these new levies and the reduced headcount at MOM should possibly cover some if not all of GST collected and maybe some more if that would make Singaporean workers and their foreign colleagues at work happier with a fairer and more just employment arrangement and thus make Singapore made products more innovative (better) and tourist more attracted to visit Singapore for it's reputation as a happy place rather than as a centrally managed economy with a novelty value the likes of North Korea, just to satisfy their lust for a sense of Schedenfrude, seeing people work their guts out here."
^This just ain't factual. My english ain't good and I myself tend to type long and winding broken sentences in the wrong grammer, but this just doesn't make sense.
If you speak in a more neutral and factual-based tone logos, I think more people will side you. With your standard of english, I presume that you have underwent an university degree. I take it that the university would have trained you to present facts and assignments in a logos tone.
http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/he...ay-feature![[Image: slide_8.jpg]](https://images.slideplayer.com/22/6405051/slides/slide_8.jpg)
![[Image: Pinnochio.png]](https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/dragon-rap-battles/images/b/b2/Pinnochio.png)
DentalFloss(PF) wroteYou realize that the allocation of electoral college votes doesn't require, or even allow, "voters" to have a say, right? As a practical matter, all 50 States have adopted that method, and most, but not all, use the "winner take all" method. But there is nothing that requires that. The State Legislature could decide to use ANY method they chose, the flip of a coin for example, or even only having the Legislature itself vote on the Electors. There is no right for the average person to have a vote at all.